Chancellor’s Spring Statement 23.03.22:

Having listened to the analysis of Britain’s chancellor Rishi Sunak’s statement yesterday on BBC news and News night, Sky news and comments in the house of commons as well, it appears to me that although everyone agrees something is not exactly right, nobody can explain what is wrong. I’m going to have to spell it out here. (Another reason why continuous teaching of God’s words properly are essential)

Your chancellor is derived originally from what we call a third world nation. If he goes on like this Britain will be a third world country good and true, with all the poverty that goes with that. He has not learned the important lessons from the Holy Bible, because heathen nations don’t read the Holy Bible. He probably does, but not in the detail required to handle the finances of a nation. God taught his people that seven good years will probably be followed by a bad year. (Not necessarily exactly either, which makes it all the more important to lay by in store to cover the barren times. ‘Save for a rainy day’ we say here) If the third world have money, they spend it with no consideration for hard times, and they then have extreme poverty with even the governments having to beg. It is called Conservatism, or conserving for possible hard times ahead. As applied by a Conservative? Should be anyway. Heathens should not have any status in a Christian nation, until they have been taught the words of God, by a single Church. God’s words are not to be ignored, and just saying you are a Christian is not enough. Blacks are good with money. Good at making it. Good at understanding it, but at conserving it they know nothing of. Anyway: This is the point all the annalists have been missing.